For the first time in months, this week delivered something that has been in short supply: a reason for cautious optimism. Reports emerged that the United States and Iran may sign an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as early as the G7 summit next week. Gas prices have already fallen from $4.40 to $4.10 a gallon in June, consumer sentiment bounced off its record low and headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation may have peaked. None of this means the headwinds have disappeared, but it could mean the fog is beginning to thin. The question now is whether the clearing lasts, or whether this is just a brief break in the clouds.

Executive Summary

• Headline CPI rose 0.5% month-over-month in May, pushing the annual rate to 4.2%, which some economists believe could mark the peak. Core CPI came in softer than expected at 0.2% month-over-month, with the annual rate at 2.8%.
• The Producer Price Index (PPI) jumped 1.1% in May, lifting annual producer price inflation to 6.4%, its highest since November 2022. Energy prices drove a 10.7% monthly increase, and Oxford Economics’ Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) nowcast points to headline inflation reaching 4.1% year-over-year, the hottest since April 2023.
• The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index rose to 48.9 in June from 44.8 in May, helped by falling gas prices. Year-ahead inflation expectations dipped to 4.6% from 4.8%, and long-run expectations fell to 3.4% from 3.9%.
• Reports suggest the United States and Iran may sign an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as early as next week at the G7 summit, a development that, if realized, would mark the most significant positive shift in the macro-outlook this year.
• The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Small Business Optimism Index fell further below its long-run average in May, with inflation cited as the single biggest challenge by 18% of firms, the highest share in nearly 18 months.

Inflation: A Peak with a Long Tail

Headline CPI rose 0.5% in May, lifting the annual rate to 4.2%. Oxford Economics believes this likely marks the peak, as gasoline prices have already begun to fall in June. Core CPI came in at a relatively tame 0.2% on the month and 2.8% year-over-year, a shade below expectations. Shelter costs, the persistent thorn in the inflation story, rose just 0.3% in May after April’s 0.6% reading, which reflected a one-time adjustment the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) had to make to correct for disruptions caused by last year’s government shutdown. Think of it this way: the fever may have broken, but the patient is not ready to leave the hospital.

The PPI told a less reassuring story. Headline producer prices jumped 1.1% in May, pushing the annual rate to 6.4%, its highest since November 2022. More concerning than the headline was the evidence that energy cost increases are broadening. Transportation and warehousing prices surged 2.6% on the month and 14.2% year-over-year, driven by elevated diesel fuel costs. Food prices rose 0.6%, up from a 0.2% gain in April, and the global fertilizer market has seen prices climb more than 28% year-over-year due to disruptions from the Middle East conflict. Fertilizer prices typically feed through to retail food prices with a six-to-twelve-month lag, which means grocery bills have not finished rising.

The artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure boom is adding its own layer of price pressure. A shortage of DRAM memory chips, driven by surging AI demand, has pushed producer prices for computer storage devices up 2% in May and 19% year-over-year. The conflict in the Middle East has also damaged infrastructure critical to AI supply chains, including natural gas and helium plants. With both the May CPI and PPI data in hand, Oxford Economics’ PCE nowcast points to headline inflation reaching 4.1% year-over-year, the hottest reading since April 2023.

• Key Takeaway: Headline CPI might have peaked, but even if it has the descent will likely be slow as energy costs continue to bleed into food, transportation and core goods. The PPI data at 6.4% show the inflationary pipeline remains full.

The Consumer: A Small Sip of Relief

After months of relentlessly unwelcome news, consumers caught a break. The University of

Michigan’s consumer sentiment index climbed to 48.9 in June from 44.8 in May, a decent bounce, though excluding last month’s reading, this would still be the lowest on record. The improvement tracked the decline in gasoline prices, which fell from $4.40 to $4.10 per gallon over the first two weeks of June. Gas prices still sit more than 30% above year-ago levels, but the direction of travel matters for psychology.

Inflation expectations edged lower as well. Year-ahead expectations ticked down to 4.6% from 4.8%, and long-run expectations dropped to 3.4% from 3.9%. That decline in long-run expectations is particularly welcome; stability on that front helps the Federal Reserve treat the oil price shock as a one-off rather than a permanent shift in the inflation regime. Low-income consumers, who spend a larger share of their budgets on gasoline, showed the biggest improvement in sentiment, a reminder that the direction of gas prices acts as an instant mood ring for the bottom half of the income distribution.

In the housing market, existing home sales rose 3.2% in May to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) of 4.17 million, above the consensus forecast. The supply of homes for sale ticked up only modestly for the spring selling season, the weakest May inventory build in years. The median price of an existing home climbed to $429,300, up 1.3% year-over-year. Given the 20-basis-point rise in mortgage rates over the course of May, the current pace is more likely a near-term ceiling rather than the start of an uptrend.

Overall, consumption growth remains on track for roughly 1.8% in 2026, down from 2.6% in 2025.

• Key Takeaway: Falling gasoline prices and declining inflation expectations provide the first genuine relief for consumers in months, but the improvement starts from a historically low base, and the broader income squeeze remains in place.

Small Business: Squeezed From Both Ends

If large corporations are the economy’s ocean liners, small businesses are the fishing boats, and the seas have been rough. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell further below its long-run average in May, with the shock of higher energy prices pushing sales, hiring and capital spending intentions all lower. The uncertainty index jumped again and now sits well above historical norms. Inflation ranked as the single biggest challenge for 18% of firms, the highest share in nearly 18 months.

The labor market signals from the NFIB survey deserve attention. Hiring intentions fell sharply, and the share of firms reporting unfilled openings also declined, which implies that April’s jump in job openings, reported a few weeks ago in the JOLTS data, was more noise than signal. This caution also applies to the blockbuster May payroll report, which the NFIB data suggests may not reflect what smaller firms are actually experiencing on the ground.

The squeeze on small firms is coming from an unusual direction: both above and below. Larger businesses are adopting AI more rapidly, gaining productivity advantages that small firms cannot match. At the same time, AI tools are enabling a wave of new business formation, driven largely by solo operators without employees. Established small and medium-sized businesses find themselves caught between big companies moving faster and solo entrepreneurs moving cheaper. It is the economic equivalent of being a mid-sized sedan on a highway shared with both sports cars and motorcycles.

• Key Takeaway: Small businesses are bearing a disproportionate share of the economic strain, and their weakening hiring intentions suggest the headline labor market data may be painting a rosier picture than conditions on the ground warrant.

Trade and Fiscal: Oil Exports Up, Tax Revenue Down

The trade deficit narrowed to $55.9 billion in April from $56.6 billion, as a 2.6% rise in exports outpaced a 2.0% increase in imports. The story behind the numbers is almost entirely about oil. Petroleum product exports jumped $9.2 billion, a direct consequence of the US/Israel-Iran war rerouting global energy flows. On the import side, capital goods purchases continued to surge, up 39.3% year-over-year, driven by AI-related demand for computers, semiconductors and accessories. All other imports declined 4.3% over the same period. The reliance on foreign electronics equipment means that AI spending, for all its domestic fanfare, contributed next to nothing to first-quarter GDP growth on a net basis.

On the fiscal side, the fingerprints of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) grew more visible. The Treasury reported a May budget deficit of $293 billion. For fiscal year 2026 to date, individual income taxes fell 4.1% and corporate taxes dropped 11.8%, clear evidence that the OBBBA’s tax cuts are beginning to weigh on receipts. Customs duties, once a bright spot, were effectively a net nothing in May as refunds of tariffs ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court fully offset incoming tariff revenue. Oxford Economics estimates roughly $23 billion of the anticipated $160 billion-plus in tariff refunds have gone out the door, with approximately $140 billion still in the pipeline. The full-year deficit forecast sits at $2.1 trillion, up from $1.91 trillion in fiscal year 2025.

• Key Takeaway: War-driven oil exports temporarily narrowed the trade gap, but the underlying import picture is dominated by AI hardware demand. The fiscal outlook is deteriorating as OBBBA tax cuts reduce receipts and tariff refunds drain customs revenue.

The Fed and the War: Cautious Hope, Measured Response

The most consequential development this week may not have come from any economic release. Reports indicate that the United States and Iran may sign an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as early as next week at the G7 summit. An “agreement has never been closer,” according to sources. If a deal materializes, the macro implications are significant, though not immediate. Damaged or dormant production facilities will take time to restart, Iranian mines will need to be removed from the Strait and normal shipping traffic will not resume overnight.

Domestic oil producers, meanwhile, have been running down inventories rather than expanding production, with crude stocks down 10% since the war began and now sitting at their lowest level since 2022. Those inventories will need to be replenished, which means industrial production in mining should get a boost over the second half of the year even if production capacity does not markedly expand.

For the Federal Reserve, a potential end to the conflict supports the view that recent hawkish rhetoric is overdone. This would support a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) shift to a more neutral stance at the June 17 meeting, which new Chair Kevin Warsh will oversee for the first time. Nevertheless, Warsh’s appointment carries a dovish influence, and the door remains open to a cut by year-end.

Initial jobless claims rose 4,000 to 229,000 in the week ended June 6, a reading Oxford Economics attributes largely to seasonal noise around the end of the school year. Continued claims rose 24,000 to 1.795 million, though the prior week saw a 6,000 downward revision, continuing a pattern of persistent downward revisions. The claims data remain consistent with a stable-to-improving labor market, though claims have clearly bounced off their recent floor.

On the trade policy front, President Trump indicated this week that he would not reauthorize the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which would send the deal into rolling annual reviews rather than terminating it outright. Crucially, USMCA-compliant goods exemptions would remain intact, and existing tariffs on Canada and Mexico would stay in place indefinitely. The impact on the United States economy is modest given its diversified export base, but persistent uncertainty would remain a small drag on business investment.

• Key Takeaway: The prospect of a Strait of Hormuz agreement is the most encouraging macro development in months. Combined with falling gas prices and a CPI that appears to have peaked, the balance of risks is shifting, even if relief for the economy will arrive gradually rather than all at once.

Final Thoughts

This week felt different. Not dramatically, not conclusively, but materially. The possibility that the Strait of Hormuz reopens within weeks, combined with a CPI that appears to have peaked and gas prices already declining, gives the 2026 macro story its first positive plot twist. The PPI at 6.4% and small business data that signal genuine distress are reminders that the damage from three months of war does not reverse quickly. But the direction matters, and for the first time since March, the direction is pointing toward improvement rather than further deterioration.

The consumer remains the economy’s bellwether. Sentiment bounced in June, but it bounced from the lowest point in the survey’s history, and the K-shaped divide between upper-income resilience and lower-income stress has not closed. Small businesses are paring back hiring and investment, which the headline labor data does not fully reflect. The fiscal outlook is deteriorating as the OBBBA’s tax cuts and tariff refunds reduce government revenue.

What makes this week’s data constructive is not that the problems have gone away, but that the ceiling on those problems may be forming. If the peace talks produce a deal, the energy shock that has driven much of this year’s economic pain begins to unwind, slowly and unevenly, but in a direction that helps. The Fed meets next week under new leadership, with an inflation picture that, while still uncomfortable, is no longer worsening. For the first time in months, the light at the end of the pipeline may actually be daylight.

Oxford Financial Group, Ltd. is a SEC-registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The information provided is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment, tax, or legal advice. Opinions are those of the author and are subject to change based on market, regulatory or economic conditions. Forward-looking statements are opinions and/or estimates and are not guarantees of future results. Data and opinions are based on sources believed to be reliable, including unaffiliated third parties such as Oxford Economics, but their accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. See important disclosures and disclaimers at https://ofgltd.com/home/disclaimers. OFG-2606-20