Home  /  Newsletters  /  CIO Macro Trends: Strong Pulse, Rising Temperature

About

Owners working with owners, families and discerning institutions® for more than 43 years.
Home  /  Newsletters  /  CIO Macro Trends: Strong Pulse, Rising Temperature

Investment e.Perspective

Insights and perspective from Oxford’s Investment Management Group, the Oxford Investment Fellows.

Home  /  Newsletters  /  CIO Macro Trends: Strong Pulse, Rising Temperature

e.Insight

Perspectives on Family Office Services from the Family Office Fellows℠ and other Oxford thought leaders.

Home  /  Newsletters  /  CIO Macro Trends: Strong Pulse, Rising Temperature

e.Telegraph

Oxford news and updates from Jeff Thomasson, Chief Executive Officer & Managing Director.

Robert “Bo” D. Ramsey III, JD, MBA, CFA, CAIA Co-Managing Partner & Chief Investment Officer
By Robert “Bo” D. Ramsey III, JD, MBA, CFA, CAIACo-Managing Partner & Chief Investment Officer

CIO Macro Trends: Strong Pulse, Rising Temperature

The May employment report landed like a firework at the end of a week that already had plenty of sparks. Payrolls exceeded expectations, manufacturing hit a four-year high and the services sector continued to expand. But before anyone uncorks the champagne, consider that job openings surged on the strength of a single industry, credit card delinquencies climbed to levels not seen since 2011, and the Federal Reserve’s newest members spent the week reminding everyone that inflation is still the main event. This is an economy with a strong pulse and a rising temperature, and that combination creates a very specific set of challenges.

Executive Summary

    • Nonfarm payrolls surged 172,000 in May, with upward revisions of 64,000 in April and 29,000 in March pushing trend job growth to 188,000, its strongest pace since March 2024. The unemployment rate held at 4.3%.

    • The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index rose 1.3 points to 54.0, the fastest expansion since May 2022, with new orders climbing 2.7 points to 56.8. The ISM nonmanufacturing index rose to 54.5, but the price index hit its highest level since August 2022.

    • Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data showed openings jumping 731,000 to 7.618 million, but the increase concentrated almost entirely in professional and business services, which accounted for 668,000 of the gain.

    • Consumer credit rose $20.7 billion in April, while the share of credit card balances more than 90 days delinquent climbed to its highest level since 2011.

The Labor Market: A Blockbuster with Fine Print
May’s payroll report read like a summer action movie: big numbers, plenty of explosions and a plot that falls apart a little if you think too hard. Nonfarm payrolls jumped 172,000, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) revised April up by 64,000 and March up by 29,000. Private-sector payrolls added 120,000. The gains came from familiar corners: healthcare posted a solid increase, construction surprised to the upside, and leisure and hospitality delivered strong numbers, likely with an assist from early World Cup hiring. State and local government employment, however, jumped by roughly 50,000, a figure Oxford Economics views as a one-off rather than the start of a new trend.

The Automatic Data Processing (ADP) national employment report added 122,000 private jobs in May, pushing its three-month moving average to 96,000. That number sits comfortably above the break-even rate of job creation, which Oxford Economics estimates at approximately zero given the collapse in net immigration and an aging population.

Now for the fine print. The JOLTS report showed job openings jumping 731,000 to 7.618 million, the highest since May 2024. Impressive, until you notice that 668,000 of the increase came from a single sector, professional and business services, and the overall hire rate actually fell 0.3 points to 3.2%. Both the quits rate and the layoff rate ticked lower, painting a picture of a labor market in a holding pattern: employers are posting openings like stores hanging “help wanted” signs but not necessarily rushing to fill them.

The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as labor force growth remained sluggish at just 83,000. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% month-over-month and 3.5% year-over-year, a pace consistent with the Fed’s 2% inflation target, which means the labor market is not generating inflationary wage pressure on its own.

  • Key Takeaway: The headline payroll number grabbed attention, but the underlying details paint a more measured picture. The labor market is warm, not hot, and the mix of strong payrolls, weak hiring rates and moderate wage growth does not scream overheating.

Manufacturing and Services: Growing but Paying Through the Nose
The factory floor had a good month. The ISM manufacturing index climbed 1.3 points to 54.0, its fastest pace of expansion since May 2022. New orders rose 2.7 points to 56.8 and 14 of 18 industries expanded new orders and production in May, a sign that the upturn has real breadth. Customer inventories remained in “too low” territory, which suggests the demand pipeline has room to run.

The catch is the price tag. The ISM prices index hovered near its highest level since the pandemic, driven by the Strait of Hormuz closure pushing up oil, fuel and raw materials costs. Producers also face shortages in memory, semiconductors and electronic components, a reminder that the artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure boom is competing for the same inputs that manufacturers need. Think of it as two dinner guests reaching for the last bread roll at the same time.

On the services side, the ISM nonmanufacturing index rose 0.9 points to 54.5, with business activity and new orders both posting solid increases. But here, too, prices are the story: the services price index climbed to its highest reading since August 2022, with energy costs the most commonly cited culprit. The report is consistent with GDP growth running at roughly a 2% annualized pace this year, a decent clip given the headwinds, but the employment index remained in contraction territory, reflecting firms that are reluctant to add headcount even as business activity improves.

  • Key Takeaway: Both the manufacturing and services sectors are expanding at a healthy pace, but price pressures from the Iran conflict, energy costs and component shortages continue to mount. Growth is real, but so is the inflation that accompanies it.

The Consumer: Spending Now, Worrying Later
Vehicle sales offered a snapshot of the consumer’s current mood: optimistic enough to buy a car but glancing nervously at the gas gauge. Light vehicle sales rose to 16.1 million annualized in May from 15.9 million in April, with Q2 sales tracking 3.7% above Q1 levels. A strong tax refund season and rising equity markets have kept consumers shopping, at least for now. But there are headwinds gathering. The $7,500 electric vehicle (EV) tax credit expired last fall, and the share of full-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in total sales dropped to just 6% in April from an average above 9% in 2025. Oxford Economics’ baseline calls for light vehicle sales to total 15.7 million in 2026, softer than the 16.2 million recorded in 2025.

Consumer credit painted a more complex picture. Total consumer credit rose $20.7 billion in April, with revolving credit up $11.6 billion and nonrevolving credit ahead by $9.1 billion. Revolving credit growth hit 3.8% year-over-year, its fastest pace since October 2024. Some of that reflects gasoline spending flowing onto credit cards. The less cheerful detail: the share of credit card balances more than 90 days delinquent has risen to its highest level since 2011, evidence that the consumers who are struggling are falling further behind, even as the top of the income distribution keeps spending.

The Federal Reserve’s Beige Book captured this divide in plain English, noting that higher-income households continue to spend freely while both middle- and lower-income households are pulling back on discretionary items. The top 20% of income earners account for more than half of new vehicle sales, which helps explain how the headline spending numbers remain positive even as the bottom half of the income ladder feels increasingly squeezed. Think of a boat where the passengers in first class are ordering drinks while the folks in economy are bailing water.

  • Key Takeaway: Consumer spending holds up in the aggregate, but the foundation is narrowing. Credit card delinquencies, fading tax refund tailwinds and rising gasoline costs all point to a consumer who is spending now and worrying later.

Housing and Construction: A Temporary Bump in the Road
April construction spending rose 0.4%, well above the consensus forecast for a decline of 0.1%. Before celebrating, take a look at what happened to the prior months: March’s gain shrank from 0.6% to 0.2% on revision, and February’s small decline deepened to a 0.8% drop. Construction data are a bit like a student’s test scores that look great until you realize the grading curve changed. The underlying trend is less impressive than the latest month suggests.

Residential spending provided a genuine bright spot, lending some upside risk to the Q2 residential investment forecast. Private nonresidential spending, however, slipped 0.2%. Within that category, spending on data centers continues to outpace everything else, but even data center spending is losing momentum. Manufacturing structures remain weak as the capital spending impulse from the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has largely played through. Apart from the AI-driven data center buildout, nonresidential spending faces a sluggish few quarters as uncertainty from the Iran conflict and rising input costs keep decision-makers cautious.

  • Key Takeaway: The April construction spending surprise looks less convincing after revisions to prior months. Residential spending provided a lift, but elevated mortgage rates and softening permit data suggest that momentum is unlikely to last.

The Fed: New Chair, Same Dilemma
If there is one piece of good news for the Federal Reserve in this week’s data, it is that the labor market is not generating inflationary pressure. Annual productivity growth sits at 2.8%, well above prior-cycle averages, and annual unit labor cost growth slipped to 0.5%, the slowest pace since 2021. In plain terms, companies are getting more output per worker and paying less per unit of that output. That combination means the Fed does not need to worry about a wage-price spiral, even as hiring picks up.

Where the Fed does need to worry is on the price side. The Beige Book reported that profit margins are being compressed as input costs, led by energy, climb faster than firms can raise selling prices. That sounds like a problem for companies, but it also means that when firms eventually do pass through those costs, the consumer will feel it. Public remarks from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members grew more hawkish through the week, with Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack both raising the possibility that the committee may need to address inflation that extends beyond energy. The June 17 meeting, which new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh will oversee for the first time, could produce a statement that removes language indicating a bias toward easing, a shift that would be notable even if rates themselves stay unchanged.

Initial jobless claims rose 13,000 to 225,000 in the week ended May 30, likely reflecting seasonal noise around the Memorial Day holiday rather than a genuine uptick. Continued claims fell 8,000 to 1.777 million, keeping the broader trend intact. The claims data give the Fed enough comfort to hold rates steady for as long as it needs. On the tariff front, Oxford Economics estimates the effective tariff rate nudged up to 9.7% from 9.3% following new announcements aimed at countries that do not restrict imports from forced-labor suppliers, a modest addition that does not change the tariff picture materially.

  • Key Takeaway: Strong productivity growth and tame unit labor costs mean the labor market is not the inflation problem. Energy costs, supply-chain pressures and the risk of eventual cost passthrough to consumers are where the Fed’s attention belongs, and new Chair Warsh inherits that challenge at his very first meeting.

Final Thoughts
This was the week the economy flexed its muscles and reminded everyone that it is still capable of producing strong numbers. Payrolls at 172,000, manufacturing at a four-year high, and services firmly in expansion: these are not the data points of an economy in distress. They are the data points of an economy that keeps finding a way to grow even as the Iran conflict, elevated energy costs and tighter immigration policy stack up headwinds.

But a strong economy running hot creates its own set of problems. The ISM price indices sitting near pandemic-era levels, credit card delinquencies at a 14-year high and FOMC members publicly floating the idea of further tightening all suggest that the bill for this growth is arriving. The consumer is funding spending through shrinking savings and expanding credit, not rising real incomes. That works for a while, but it is not a recipe for sustainability.

The two-speed dynamic persists: businesses investing aggressively (in narrow areas), upper-income households spending confidently and the bottom half of the income distribution absorbing the brunt of higher prices. The labor market gives the Fed cover to hold steady, but price pressures give it no room to ease. For now, the strong pulse and the rising temperature coexist, and the question for every investor, policymaker and household is how long that balance holds.

Oxford Financial Group, Ltd. is a SEC-registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The information provided is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment, tax, or legal advice. Opinions are those of the author and are subject to change based on market, regulatory or economic conditions. Forward-looking statements are opinions and/or estimates and are not guarantees of future results. Data and opinions are based on sources believed to be reliable, including unaffiliated third parties such as Oxford Economics, but their accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. See important disclosures and disclaimers at https://ofgltd.com/home/disclaimers.OFG-2606-7